top of page
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Speak out Against Mesh - Publicly Or Confidentially


First off, my sincere thanks to all of you who have reached out to me and shared your litigation experiences either over the phone or through the procedural justice survey. I've learned so much from each of you and am so grateful to you all for taking the time to help me grasp the scope of the harm that mesh has wrought.


I've been writing about how courts deal with mass torts like those over mesh since 2004, but so much of what I know is just theory. If academics don't understand what's happening on the ground and how these cases affect real people, then there's no way for us to propose and help implement changes that fix things that are actually broken (rather than what we assume the problems might be).


One thing I've heard often is that litigants are afraid to speak out because their attorneys have counseled them not to. Often times, it's for good reason: defendants may try to use things that you've said publicly or on social media against you in a deposition if a story has inconsistencies.


But this can leave plaintiffs feeling voiceless. So, I've compiled a short list of ideas for ways that you can speak out. Some are public, like filing with the FDA, while others are private and confidential.

1) Submit your comments to the FDA Advisory Committee by January 27, 2019 - Public.


The Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee is the name of the FDA committee holding the meeting on February 12. That committee provides advice and recommendations to the FDA about the way it regulates pelvic mesh.

The FDA is creating a docket for public comment (FDA-2018-N-4395). You can submit comments that will appear on that docket and will be provided to the Committee before it meets in February.

In order to do so, you need to submit those comments on or before January 27, 2019. Comments submitted after January 27 but before February 11 will still appear on the docket and be considered by the FDA, but will not be provided to the Committee. So, submit early.


Click on this link and follow the instructions given. Note that the link does not work if you try to open it using a Safari browser; use Firefox, Chrome, or Explorer instead.

When I followed the comment rabbit trail (it took a little doing to find the exact agency and comment page), I saw that only 24 comments have been received (that's up slightly from when I last posted about this, but not much). The link I've provides should take you exactly where you need to go without having to go through the same hoops I did.

2) Take the Procedural Justice Survey as soon as possible - private and confidential.


I am conducting a procedural justice study on women's health mass torts like pelvic mesh and would really love to add your voice to the over 200 I've heard from so far. I am a law professor at the University of Georgia and am an expert on the procedures that courts use to resolve mass torts. I'll use your comments to form the backbone of recommendations that I make to the judges handling mesh cases and the many mass torts that will come in the future. If you have ideas--I'm all ears.

Your identity will be kept confidential and nothing that you tell me will affect your case in any way. Nothing that I ask is covered by attorneys' "gag" orders. I am focused on your feelings about the process, and am not seeking confidential information.


Nevertheless, if you'd prefer not to include your name on the survey (which, again, would be kept confidential), you can send that to me separately via email (masstortsuga@gmail.com) or I can ask you the questions over the phone. Names just allow me to confirm your eligibility to participate in the study by cross-checking court records.

If there are things I should know that I haven't asked you about or if there's something that you want to share with me, just email me. My masstortsuga@gmail.com address is not subject to open records act requests like my university email address is, so I suggest that you use that one, but I will receive it either way.

So, please take the survey. You can skip any questions that you'd rather not answer and the whole thing will take you around 20 minutes. Like the FDA comment website, it tends not to work with Safari, but does work with Firefox, Chrome, and Explorer.

3) Submit adverse events to the FDA - public.


Patients, healthcare professionals, and manufactures can all submit reports of adverse events. Here is a link to the form you can use to submit a problem to the FDA. And here's the FDA's Q&A page.


4) Send your attorney a victim impact statement - private.


From what I'm hearing, many of the attorneys that plaintiffs originally contacted have sold their cases to another attorney or partnered with an attorney who handles lots of mesh cases. Many women feel like numbers, not people. So, sending your attorney an account of the ways that mesh has changed your life might help--at least if it gets read.


Other ideas? Send them to me and I'll update this post.

1,251 Comments


Mình thường đọc kỹ phần thống kê trước khi trải nghiệm một nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến. Khi xem qua các con số được công bố, mình thấy hệ thống đề cập đến lượng tài khoản hoạt động và số trò chơi phong phú. Trong quá trình tìm hiểu thêm về OPEN88 mình nhận thấy cấu trúc nội dung được xây dựng mạch lạc, giúp người dùng dễ theo dõi. Giao diện nhìn gọn gàng và thân thiện. Cá nhân mình cảm thấy cách trình bày khá rõ ràng.

Like

An An
An An
5 hours ago

Trong lúc rảnh mình vô tình thấy OPEN88 khi tham khảo vài bình luận trên diễn dàn, vì được khá nhiều lượt nhắc đến nên cũng thử mở xem thử. Mình chỉ xem lướt qua cách cách sắp xếp nội dung tổng thể. Cảm thấy là trình bày khá gọn gàng, mạch lạc, rất dễ theo dõi.

Like

Mình biết đến F168 khá tình cờ khi đọc qua vài ý kiến trao đổi trên mạng, thấy nhắc nhiều nên cũng mở ra xem thử lúc rảnh. Mình không xem chi tiết mà chỉ lướt nhanh để hình dung cách trình bày chung, cảm giác là nội dung được sắp xếp khá mạch lạc, xem qua cũng dễ hiểu và không gây rối mắt.

Like

Đại Dương
Đại Dương
20 hours ago

Tôi thường ưu tiên các bài viết giới thiệu nền tảng giải trí được viết súc tích để tiện xem nhanh.

Phần nhắc đến F168 được đặt ở giữa bài nên nội dung khá hợp lý.

Nền tảng được giới thiệu rõ ràng, thao tác mượt mà.

Tổng thể dễ đọc nên không tốn nhiều thời gian.

Like

Vì chủ yếu chơi trên điện thoại nên mình khá chú ý đến trải nghiệm mobile. Khi thử chuyển từ slot sang thể thao rồi qua game bài, mình thấy tốc độ tải khá nhanh. Nội dung được phân chia rõ nên việc điều hướng cũng nhẹ nhàng. Lúc mình vào Usbet chỉ xem nhanh để nắm bố cục tổng thể và cách trình bày, chưa tìm hiểu kỹ, nhưng ấn tượng ban đầu là trang sắp xếp gọn gàng. Theo mình, cách tổ chức này giúp mang lại trải nghiệm khá liền mạch.

Like

For media or other inquiries, please contact me directly:

706-542-5203

University of Georgia School of Law

225 Herty Drive

Athens Georgia 30606

bottom of page