top of page
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Speak out Against Mesh - Publicly Or Confidentially


First off, my sincere thanks to all of you who have reached out to me and shared your litigation experiences either over the phone or through the procedural justice survey. I've learned so much from each of you and am so grateful to you all for taking the time to help me grasp the scope of the harm that mesh has wrought.


I've been writing about how courts deal with mass torts like those over mesh since 2004, but so much of what I know is just theory. If academics don't understand what's happening on the ground and how these cases affect real people, then there's no way for us to propose and help implement changes that fix things that are actually broken (rather than what we assume the problems might be).


One thing I've heard often is that litigants are afraid to speak out because their attorneys have counseled them not to. Often times, it's for good reason: defendants may try to use things that you've said publicly or on social media against you in a deposition if a story has inconsistencies.


But this can leave plaintiffs feeling voiceless. So, I've compiled a short list of ideas for ways that you can speak out. Some are public, like filing with the FDA, while others are private and confidential.

1) Submit your comments to the FDA Advisory Committee by January 27, 2019 - Public.


The Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee is the name of the FDA committee holding the meeting on February 12. That committee provides advice and recommendations to the FDA about the way it regulates pelvic mesh.

The FDA is creating a docket for public comment (FDA-2018-N-4395). You can submit comments that will appear on that docket and will be provided to the Committee before it meets in February.

In order to do so, you need to submit those comments on or before January 27, 2019. Comments submitted after January 27 but before February 11 will still appear on the docket and be considered by the FDA, but will not be provided to the Committee. So, submit early.


Click on this link and follow the instructions given. Note that the link does not work if you try to open it using a Safari browser; use Firefox, Chrome, or Explorer instead.

When I followed the comment rabbit trail (it took a little doing to find the exact agency and comment page), I saw that only 24 comments have been received (that's up slightly from when I last posted about this, but not much). The link I've provides should take you exactly where you need to go without having to go through the same hoops I did.

2) Take the Procedural Justice Survey as soon as possible - private and confidential.


I am conducting a procedural justice study on women's health mass torts like pelvic mesh and would really love to add your voice to the over 200 I've heard from so far. I am a law professor at the University of Georgia and am an expert on the procedures that courts use to resolve mass torts. I'll use your comments to form the backbone of recommendations that I make to the judges handling mesh cases and the many mass torts that will come in the future. If you have ideas--I'm all ears.

Your identity will be kept confidential and nothing that you tell me will affect your case in any way. Nothing that I ask is covered by attorneys' "gag" orders. I am focused on your feelings about the process, and am not seeking confidential information.


Nevertheless, if you'd prefer not to include your name on the survey (which, again, would be kept confidential), you can send that to me separately via email (masstortsuga@gmail.com) or I can ask you the questions over the phone. Names just allow me to confirm your eligibility to participate in the study by cross-checking court records.

If there are things I should know that I haven't asked you about or if there's something that you want to share with me, just email me. My masstortsuga@gmail.com address is not subject to open records act requests like my university email address is, so I suggest that you use that one, but I will receive it either way.

So, please take the survey. You can skip any questions that you'd rather not answer and the whole thing will take you around 20 minutes. Like the FDA comment website, it tends not to work with Safari, but does work with Firefox, Chrome, and Explorer.

3) Submit adverse events to the FDA - public.


Patients, healthcare professionals, and manufactures can all submit reports of adverse events. Here is a link to the form you can use to submit a problem to the FDA. And here's the FDA's Q&A page.


4) Send your attorney a victim impact statement - private.


From what I'm hearing, many of the attorneys that plaintiffs originally contacted have sold their cases to another attorney or partnered with an attorney who handles lots of mesh cases. Many women feel like numbers, not people. So, sending your attorney an account of the ways that mesh has changed your life might help--at least if it gets read.


Other ideas? Send them to me and I'll update this post.

1,137 Comments


Page Dang
Page Dang
2 hours ago

Trong lúc rảnh mình vô tình thấy https://tk999.in.net/ khi tham khảo vài bình luận trên diễn dàn, vì được khá nhiều lượt nhắc đến nên cũng thử mở xem thử. Mình chỉ xem lướt qua cách cách sắp xếp nội dung tổng thể. Cảm thấy là trình bày khá gọn gàng, mạch lạc, rất dễ theo dõi.

Like

baon36609
7 hours ago

Khi đang đọc các bình luận trao đổi trên một diễn đàn, mình bắt gặp một Sc88 com được chèn vào giữa câu chuyện. Vì tò mò nên mình bấm vào xem qua. Chủ yếu để quan sát cách bố trí nội dung trên trang. Lướt nhanh vài phần thì thấy tổng thể khá gọn gàng. Giao diện tạo cảm giác tương đối rõ ràng và dễ theo dõi. Sau đó mình quay lại diễn đàn để đọc tiếp các trao đổi khác.

Like

Hà Lưu
Hà Lưu
12 hours ago

Tôi thường ưu tiên các bài viết giới thiệu nền tảng giải trí được viết súc tích để tiện xem nhanh. Phần nhắc đến lô đề online được đặt ở giữa bài nên nội dung khá hợp lý.Bài viết thể hiện rõ ràng, giao diện dễ nhìn và thân thiện.Nhìn chung nội dung dễ tiếp cận, không gây khó khăn khi sử dụng.

Like

Du Phúc
Du Phúc
14 hours ago

Vì chủ yếu chơi trên điện thoại nên mình khá chú ý đến trải nghiệm mobile. mình vào đánh lô online  thấy tốc độ tải khá nhanh. Nội dung được phân chia rõ nên việc điều hướng cũng nhẹ nhàng. Lúc mình vào xem kỹ hơn thì cũng được bố trí khá gọn. Theo mình, cách tổ chức này giúp mang lại trải nghiệm khá liền mạch.

Like

dai lat
dai lat
a day ago

Tôi thường có xu hướng chọn những bài viết giới thiệu nền tảng giải trí được trình bày súc tích, dễ hiểu để có thể lướt nhanh trên điện thoại mà vẫn nắm được các ý chính. Việc đề cập đến LLWIN ở phần giữa bài giúp nội dung trôi chảy hơn, không gây cảm giác quảng cáo quá lộ liễu ngay từ đầu. Bài viết mô tả nền tảng theo cách đơn giản, dễ tiếp cận, nhấn mạnh thao tác mượt mà và các danh mục quen thuộc như slot, game bài hay mini game, giúp người đọc dễ hình dung. Tổng thể, cách diễn đạt tập trung vào trải nghiệm chung, vừa đủ thông tin, không lan man, tạo…

Like

For media or other inquiries, please contact me directly:

706-542-5203

University of Georgia School of Law

225 Herty Drive

Athens Georgia 30606

bottom of page